Viral Video Friday

Jesse Bouman :: February 26th, 2010

Another Friday is upon us. Another Viral Video Friday is here. Another round of applause for me ;)

Nike: The Human Chain
Nike really knows how to connect with athletes and former athletes.

Sprite: Spark
If creativity was only this easy.



Skype Is Mobile

Do you remember Skype?

Whale Expert: SeaWorld Attack Was ‘Premeditated’
There was a sad turn of events this week when a killer whale actually killed a Sea World Trainer.

Windows 7 ‘My Idea’ parody by College Humor
Let’s finish this VVF with a humorous end.

See more funny videos and funny pictures at CollegeHumor.

Wpromote Makes A Splash at Online Marketing Summit San Diego

Mike Mothner :: February 25th, 2010

I write this as I look across the usually sun-drenched (but presently surprisingly chilly) panorama of Mission Bay, San Diego, as the 2010 Online Marketing Summit draws quietly to a close. It officially kicks off what will be a terrifically busy 2010 as our marketing efforts continue to expand. OMS at Paradise PointWe will be criss-crossing the country, and sponsoring, exhibiting and speaking at Search Engine Strategies, SMX, Ad:tech, the DMA conference, Internet Retailer, Inc Magazine’s GrowCo and Inc 500 events, and more. So if you are a client, future client, partner, or vendor, chances are we will be visiting a city near you, and we would love nothing more than to meet in person!

Online Marketing Summit, or OMS as it is commonly referred, is a new addition to our conference calendar and a fun one to add, with their largest event each year taking place just “down the road” in San Diego. We thought it was a solid event, both in that it is very education-based (with sponsors but not your typical expo hall environment), and seems to pull a different mix of companies than the traditional online marketing shows, which is exciting and refreshing!Advanced SEO Panel

On Tuesday, I spoke on a terrific panel (I must say one of the best that I saw at the conference) entitled “SEO 2.0 Leadership Forum”, which was an advanced SEO panel expertly moderated by Rand Fishkin of SEOmoz fame. In addition to myself, there was an all-star cast that included Marshall Simmonds is the Chief Search Strategist at NYTimes.com, Jorie Waterman who is the SVP of Search at MRM Worldwide and works with Fortune 100 clients, Laura Lippay from Yahoo!, and Lauren Vaccarello who heads up SEM at SalesForce.com. Needless to say, a diverse group bringing a hard-to-match breadth of expertise to the table. I think the audience got exactly what they were looking for (though we probably could have done a whole day of it) and it was all around a lot of fun to be a part of!

Wpromote Education TableAfter the panel, the rest of the Wpromote crew and myself enjoyed doing one-on-one PPC, SEO and Website consultations with a number of attendees, attending other sessions and spending time at our sponsors table, where we had the privilege of handing out the drink tickets for the nightly (yes nightly!) happy hours.

So what’s next? Well, you don’t have to wait long! In just 96 hours from departing OMS, we are back in action at SMX Santa Clara (booth 214) with a crew of 7 from Wpromote. Much more to come, including a dedicated theater session and maybe more exciting, the unveiling of the new Wpromote booth! Stay tuned…

If I Had My Way: Volume 2

Matthew Burr :: February 24th, 2010

Disclaimer: This post is meant to be purely satirical. It is tongue-in-cheek, and we ask that readers keep that in mind. Please take no offense to anything contained herein. Wpromote and many of its employees are active users of Twitter and other similar services, and we encourage all to explore and utilize these social media tools. — The Management

If I had my way… there would be an end to inane tweets.

I mean, who gives a crap?

I don’t. That’s for certain.

I don’t care that you’re extra tired today because you stayed up late playing Farmville. I don’t care that some days, your shoes just won’t stay tied. I don’t care that your favorite song just came on the radio. I don’t care. I don’t care. I don’t care.

Now, I understand the hypocrisy of writing a blog post criticizing microbloggers (I secretly hope no one reads this), and I understand how easy it is to avoid Twitter and the other sources of mindless drivel. However, this is one of those things, the mere existence and popularity of which just bother me.

To whom are these people speaking? Their friends? I can’t imagine they have many. Otherwise, they wouldn’t feel the need to tweet in the first place. Does tweeting make them feel important? Heard? Connected? They’re not. They’re merely putting noise into the desolate wasteland of cyberspace. It is a disturbing trend of self-importance being used to mask feelings of loneliness and low self-worth. I’m pretty sure that were Narcissus alive today, he would have died from Tweeting.

A study published by Pear Analytics last August found that over 40% of tweets can be classified as “Pointless Babble,” defined as “I am eating a sandwich now” tweets, the worst kind. That seems about right. The next most common classification was “Conversational,” which consists of back-and-forth communication between individuals. These tweets make up almost another 40% of the total. Why are these people having one-on-one conversations in a public forum? What’s wrong with phone, email, IM, text… ? They’re like the people who have conversations in crowded elevators. I hate them, too. To top it off, another 10% of tweets are made up of “Spam” and “Self promotion.” So, that brings us to almost 90% of all tweets being completely worthless and devoid of anything other than self-service and -import.

Now, this is not to discredit those who use Twitter responsibly, those who fall in that remaining 10%. Wpromote has dozens of clients who use the service effectively as a tool to communicate and interact with their potential clients and customers. Further, we have a number of employees who distribute insightful, thought-provoking or humorous stories and musings through their Twitter accounts. In fact, right here on this blog, our one-and-only Amanda Moshier published an informative piece on the opportunities and benefits presented by Twitter. There is simply no questioning the potential behind this platform.

However, this is meant to address those who abuse it, those who clog our existence with their desperate needs for attention. Next time you go to tweet, ask yourself a few questions first.  Do people want to hear about my iced soy vanilla green tea chai latte?  Do people want to know the color of my dog’s poo?  Do people care how full I feel after eating In-N-Out?  No, they do not.  Ask yourself if people actually will give a crap or if you just really WANT them to give a crap… because there’s an enormous difference.

Oh, and make sure to retweet this!  Loves!

Tues News: 2/23 (Sexy Edition)

Michael Block :: February 23rd, 2010
Oh man! Now, that's what I call "modestly hot!"

Oh man! Now, that's what I call "modestly hot!"

Whoa, this is sure to be a popular version of the Tues News, am I right? Maybe not. After all, what’s sexy to a search marketer and what’s sexy to you (we call you guys “normies”) may not align. Still, just because Wpromote is a respected corporation doesn’t mean we can’t comment on the world of sensual goings on online.

I won’t keep you all in suspense anymore; let’s get going!

  • Apple recently dashed the hopes and dreams of aficionados of sexy imagery by banning all sexual content from the app store. Although this may come as a boon to parents and watchdog groups, this comes as terrible news both for males aged 5 to 95 as well as developers of apps that don’t actually contain sexual content but could possibly be used in conjunction with sexual content. For example: an application called Wobble allowed a user to make parts of a static image appear to wobble, as the name might suggest. Of course, the application was often used on parts of the female anatomy to liven up beach photos, but that was the choice of the user, not the creators of the app; you could also use it on a photo of Jello, if you so chose. This presents problems of hypocrisy, as MG Siegler of TechCrunch writes. Safari is probably the most popular application for viewing pornographic photos and it’s a product of Apple! Of course, Safari isn’t going anywhere–neither are apps from companies like Sports Illustrated or Playboy–and there appears to be little logic behind it. The app store is Apple’s and Apple’s alone, so it is always their decision regarding which apps to reject or accept; it’s just somewhat disheartening that the determining factors appear not to be concern for children but rather, concern for their own bottom line. [TechCrunch]
  • The Tues News is, generally, not what I would call a gossip rag, however, it’s not generally normal for the mistress of Google’s CEO to post a blog exposing their relationship (allegedly!). I should stipulate that I’m not a journalist and I don’t hang out with Eric Schmidt, so I don’t know what’s true and what’s a lie. That said, it appears that not only may this relationship be real, not only may the blog be legitimate but Schmidt may have had the blog removed altogether! Unfortunately for his alleged mistress, she went with Blogger (a Google property) to host her blog… oops! Let this be a lesson to all you scorned men and women out there: if you want to post a blog about your ex-lover, make sure that they don’t own the domain name! They may have to live with the shame of entertaining a extramarital affair but they certainly do not have to host your website! [Valleywag]
  • What could be steamier and sexier than sultry online content or a scandalous fling? Well, how about getting a voyeuristic look at what’s hidden behind the clothes of… Google’s search supremacy? Oh yeah, now that’s what I’m talking about! I told you our tastes were probably different! Anyway, Wired.com wrote an excellent piece about why Google’s search algorithm came to dominate the Internet in the manner that has for the last several years. Perhaps unsurprisingly, the answer seems to be a combination of attention to detail, commitment to innovation, dedicated computing resources and a little bit of luck! Oh Google, you really know how to get me going! [Wired.com]

I assume that everyone is now going to need a long, cold shower after reading those three salacious stories. I know I do! Well, I won’t hold either of us up any longer. Thanks for stopping by. Read up on and keep up with the online world; keep reading Tues News! Catch ya later!

Anchor Text Test: Making The Most Of A Link Opportunity

John Vantine :: February 22nd, 2010

Link building may not be rocket science, but it can be difficult. It’s not always easy to find “authority” sites in your niche that are willing to link to you - and when you find someone with a relevant site/blog who is willing, the link may not be on your terms. Likewise, while guest posting is a great way to build links, best practices change frequently and it can be tough to keep up.

Despite these inconsistencies, however, one factor remains that contributes greatly to any link building initiative and that factor is anchor text.

The importance of anchor text when link building

When link building, anchor text is key. Ideally, anchor text should take the form of keywords for which you want your site to rank. However, since other sites will invariably link to you, it can be difficult to control how these links are anchored.

Say, for example, you run an online snowboarding store… We’ll call it snowstuff.com. You want your store to rank well for relevant terms in your niche - terms like “snowboards” - and the way people link to you matters. Ideally, you’d have links from many “authority” sites in your niche and most of them would use the anchor text “snowboards.” Unfortunately, however, some people who link to you may use some other less-than-desirable anchor text, like “snowstuff.com,” or even “click here,” neither of which help your site rank for important keywords. You may try to convince them to change the anchor text, but this isn’t easy, and doesn’t always work. This may sound negative, but bear with me - I’m trying to set the stage.

How to successfully leverage anchor text

In the instance you are in complete control of the manner in which a webmaster links back to your site, you want to make the most of it by leveraging anchor text properly.

For example, let’s say you’re doing a guest post on a 3rd party blog to promote your online snowboarding store. Given the opportunity, an inexperienced SEO may feel inclined to include a plethora of backlinks to their site, using several different terms for which they want to rank, like “snowboards,” “used snowboards,” “cheap snowboards” and “snowboard gear,” all in one blog post, and all linking back to the same URL (snowstuff.com).

I have seen this strategy employed and was skeptical about its effectiveness. Now, a recent test done by Wordstream.com has confirmed my suspicions: multiple links to the same URL originating from one page is not effective. To be more specific, Google only considers the anchor text used in the first instance of a link to a URL. The anchor text used in subsequent links to the same URL is ignored.

What does this mean? Well, in the guest post scenario detailed above, only the “snowboards” link to snowstuff.com would be counted by Google. The other 3 would be ignored, and snowstuff.com would see no positive growth in the SERPs for the keywords “used snowboards,” “cheap snowboards,” or “snowboard gear”… At least not as a result of those 3 particular backlinks.

Does this mean you should only use one link to your domain in a blog post? Not necessarily.

Testing the effectiveness of multiple links within a post

By now, it’s understood that linking to the same URL more than once in a post does little to help a site’s ranking. However, many sites have more than one page they’d like to rank.

For example, in addition to its homepage, snowstuff.com might have a landing page for snowboard bindings they’d like to rank as well. Would it be effective to link to snowstuff.com/snowboard-bindings (using the anchor text “snowboard bindings”) in addition to snowstuff.com (using the anchor text “snowboards”) in the same blog post?

I decided to throw together a little test to find out.

To start, I created a little div at the bottom of Wpromote’s “About the Team” page. This div contained a blurb with 3 links going to johnvantine.com, a domain of mine that has more or less been gathering dust for the past few years. I chose 3 unique anchor texts that, as far as I could tell, didn’t occur anywhere else on the web.

Initial anchor text test

A screenshot of our anchor text test, which temporarily resided on the Wpromote About Us page

As you can see in the ridiculously good looking diagram above, the first link (”j0hnv4nt1n3.com”) pointed to johnvantine.com. The second link (”wpr0m0t3″) also pointed to johnvantine.com. So, based on what we learned from Wordstream’s test, the second link should be ignored by Google, because it points to the same URL as the first. The third link (”mamachajj”) pointed to johnvantine.com/anchor-text-test-landing-page/; this link was the test variable.

So what happened?

I setup Google alerts for all 3 keywords/instances of anchor text used in the test blurb. It took Google about a week to detect the text on Wpromote’s “About the Team” page, and another two weeks or so for the links to be followed and indexed. When they were finally indexed, a search for the first instance of anchor text revealed the following result:

What happens when we search for our first keyword, "johnv4nt1n3.com"?

What happens when we search for our first keyword, johnv4nt1n3.com?

As you can see above, a search for our first keyword, “j0hnv4nt1n3.com,” yielded 2 results: a link to it’s non-leetspeak counterpart, johnvantine.com, and of course the wpromote.com page where the anchor text originally appeared.

What about our second keyword, wpr0m0t3?

What about our second keyword, wpr0m0t3?

A search for our second keyword, “wpr0m0t3,” only returned the wpromote.com page where the keyword appeared. So this confirms Wordstream’s findings: only the anchor text from the first instance of a link to a URL is counted. Am I starting to sound like a broken record here?

...And the third keyword, mamachajj?

...And the third keyword, mamachajj?

Our third keyword, “mamachajj,” yielded 2 results: the page on johnvantine.com I created for it, as well as the wpromote.com page where it originally appeared.

SIDE NOTE: In viewing the search results, you’ll notice Google replaced the title tags for johnvantine.com with the keyword being searched in each instance. Had I provided the keyword in the copy on the site (or in the title tags perhaps), I don’t think that this would have happened.

The final word on multiple links = good news

The results of my test indicate that using multiple links within a post works. While linking to the same domain multiple times using different anchor text within a post does not contribute to ranking beyond the first instance of the link, linking to different pages on the same domain using different anchor text does help ranking, and can be leveraged accordingly!

So the next time you’re building links for your own site (or for a client), keep in mind that more than one link can be effective. Personally, I would use no more than 3 links to the same domain on one page, as the value of links diminish as more of them are present. Of course, if you decide to include multiple links to the same URL on a page, make sure that the first link contains your desired anchor text, as subsequent links will be ignored.

I hope this experiment deepens your understanding of anchor text, and I look forward to sharing the results of future tests. Now get out there and start building links!

Viral Video Friday

Jesse Bouman :: February 19th, 2010

Kick back and relax for this week’s Viral Video Friday. I should really insert a boss button on these posts.

We Are The World 25 For Haiti - Official Video
In an effort to help the people of Haiti, Lionel Richie and Quincy Jones gathered today’s top artists to recreate their 1985 video, We Are The World.



Stargate Studios Virtual Backlot Reel 2009

Prepare to have your mind blown. TV will never be the same to you.


A Brief History of Pretty Much Everything

Title says it all.


Cyanide & Happiness - Barbershop Quartet Hits On Girl From Taxi

Backseat driving is always better than driver side flirting.

L.A.R.P. Live Avatar Role Playing
As if being from Wisconsin isn’t hard enough in California, this video has to pop up on the Internet.