written by:

Hi folks, and happy Wednesday. It’s a short one this week and I hope you found the long weekend as productive and exciting as I did. I spent it finishing up a long overdue freelance project, being stalked by a former resident of the house I currently live in (scary), standing 10-feet away from a mind-blowing Valentine’s Day performance by Mirror/Dash, aka Kim Gordon and Thurston Moore of alterna-rock legend Sonic Youth, and taking a trip to Guitar Center to replace my DJ headphones in time for my next gig. Let me tell you, it’s a dangerous place that Guitar Center and I’m lucky I made it out of there with *just* headphones.

Mirror/Dash live in 2005

The Mirror/Dash show was amazing. It happened at the MoCA opening for Dan Graham’s retrospective “Beyond,” and was meant for MoCA members only but I managed to score to comp tix and I’m so glad I did. Not only did I impress my Valentine with my uber-cool connections and totally indie taste in music (yes!), I also got the chance to take some crazy low-res footage of the band using my camera phone, which I later uploaded to YouTube and Facebook.

If you are at all a fan of experimental, grunge, noise rock, and the like, you may want to check it out here (and here, and here).

Anyhow, I figure now is a good time to discuss the news about Facebook and the changes made to its Terms of Service (TOS), changes which were implemented without much fanfare until The Consumerist posted a blog about it over the holiday weekend.

Apparently, as of February 4th, anything you post onto Facebook is owned by them from now until infinity. This means even if you decide to delete your account, any artwork, writing, photography, or information you’ve posted to the site since you created your profile will reside on a server somewhere in Facebook-land, easily accessible by anyone covered under the new TOS. That was until yesterday.

Photo courtesy of The New York Times

Photo courtesy of The New York Times

After increasing pressure from users and privacy advocates, on Tuesday, February 17, Facebook finally reverted back to its old TOS and posted a brief message to users upon login regarding the awkward change of plans.

This is not the first time Facebook has backpedaled after making an unpopular decision, and it makes one wonder just who is manning the ship? More importantly, who exactly owns the videos I posted to my Facebook profile this past Sunday while the ‘new’ TOS was still in effect? None of this is clear, and I think it should be. Some will say anything you put on the Internet is no longer yours and anyone who complains about social networks ‘stealing’ their content is being a crybaby. I disagree. I think Facebook should demonstrate it values its user base. I think Facebook should express in no uncertain terms not only what rights it claims to its users’ content, but also, what it plans to do with those rights – and why they feel the need to be so greedy.

If anyone is interested, here is Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg’s response from the Facebook blog. Sigh.


6 thoughts on “Facebook Drama, and What About My Videos?
  1. newid says:

    Their ToS was as bad -if not worse- than the Myspace ToS.

  2. Dom says:

    Facebook makes all kinds of bad decisions. When they decided to not allow the Whopper Sacrifice application I decided to hate them forever.

    To recap…

    I like Whoppers.

    I hate Facebook.

  3. Gina says:

    Good story, I’m joining Facebook right now and posting pictures of everyone but me!

  4. Gabriel says:

    Did they plan on making money off of the information they take?

    1. That’s what everyone is asking.

      Technically, they already do make money off of the information by selling highly targeted advertising. Which means if you’re a single white male who notes your love of Nascar and Football in your Facebook profile, you’ll likely be served ads for Nascar gear, DirectTV, and beer.

      I believe the question at hand really is ‘What ELSE do they plan on doing with the information?’ And why can’t they be more upfront about the entire thing?

  5. kmoth says:

    I was pretty surprised when I heard the news too. Although I’m not even one to post videos or art work, it does make you question who really had control over the personal info that you post on your profile. I also wish I had a better grasp of why the decision was made to change the terms in the first place… I don’t see how they expected to make that change without an immediate uproar from users.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Trade Show Season Has Begun!

5 Things to Avoid When Writing for the Web
Internet News

Vlog Episode 12 – “Valentines Day Massacres”
Become An Insider!

Thanks for signing up to be a Wpromote Insider.
You’ll be the first to get the scoop on our latest services, promotions and industry news.

Recent Posts
Meet The Employee: Brittany Stubbs
Honoring Women In Tech
  • Los Angeles HQ: 866.977.6668
  • Chicago: 310.529.4578
  • San Francisco: 310.683.0435