More than you may realize, these days many of the blogs you read are actually written for one purpose.

Search Engine Rankings

Often a writer will be given a keyword phrase such as ‘Blog Search Rankings‘ and be told to write a 500-700 word post about that. The sole purpose of this is to help their site rank higher for that search term. The only real way to improve rankings and this is the kicker: is to build great sites.

So, while choosing interesting topics to write about may seem like a better idea than writing about the sites main keywords, the very best way to do this is to write something interesting that ties back into the primary search phrase you wish to rank for.

So for example, if you wanted to write about ‘Blog Search Rankings’ as this post is mainly focused on, my approach in this article that you are reading is to be ‘helpful’ in some manner. It is a ‘how to’ style post that describes something useful that a reader may actually use.

On that note here are some ‘how to tips’ for blog writing that will help with your search engine rankings.

H1 tags

After you post your blog, in FireFox press either ‘Control-U’ or ‘Command-U’ to view the source. Older IE6 or other browser users may need to use the dropdown menu and select ‘View Source’. If your blogging software is configured correctly, hopefully the title of your post will be in an H1 tag. If it isn’t you may consider editing some of your preferences to make this so. The key about H1s is that you should only have ONE per page that highlights the most important keyword phrase for that page. For this post the only H1 tag you will find that is actually rendered is the one surrounding ‘How to Write Blog Posts that Rank Well in Search Engines’ at the top of this post.

H2, H3, H4 tags. - Any sub headings should be surrounded by H2 tags, and tertiary levels of headings should be H3, H4, etc. the further you go indenting. You can use your style sheets to determine what the respective heading will look like.

For example you could put:

<H2 class=”header-2-style”>

if you have a class called ‘.header-2-style’ predefined in your stylesheet.

This is something you can easily do while posting your piece and doesn’t have to be done later by some ‘SEO Expert’.

Link Titles, Title & Alt Attributes for Images

As many of you may already know, when you mouseover an image sometimes descriptive text will be displayed. This is from the ‘alt’ attribute in the <img> tag. More less widespread is the use of a ‘title’ attribute within the <img> tag.

i.e. <img src=”http://www.wpromote.com/affiliates/wpromote.jpg” title=”The Wpromote Logo” alt=”Wpromote Logo”>

Notice how there are both a title and an alt description. These serve two purposes…the title is for google and the alt is for the user who mouses over the image and gets a description.

For Hyperlinks the same concept of a title applies and not many people would ever think to do this intuitively. This is what you should use:

<a href=”http://www.wpromote.com” title=”Wpromote PPC Management Experts” target=”_blank”>Wpromote PPC Management</a>

Every link on your site should have a title. The title tells Google what your links are and will help with your rankings. Now if you want to hyperlink the image above to go to the site in the link example above…it may seem like a lot but this is really what you should put in the source code:

<a href=”http://www.wpromote.com” title=”Wpromote PPC Management Experts” target=”_blank”><img src=”http://www.wpromote.com/affiliates/wpromote.jpg” title=”The Wpromote Logo” alt=”Wpromote Logo”></a>

Here is the same example rendered:

Other Tips

If you use WordPress (I am currently using WordPress to edit this post) depending on which SEO(Search Engine Optimization) related plugins you use there will be options to create custom titles etc. If you use the ‘SEO Title Tag’ plugin from NetConcepts then you will have that option - i’d suggest cutting and pasting the post title in the ‘Title Tag’ field that appears AFTER the post when this plugin is turned on.

Tags

Be sure to add keywords that are in your post to the ‘Tags’ section in WordPress right after the post content section. examples: for this post I will include: Seo Title Tag Plugin, Title Tag Plugin, Blog Seo, Blog Search Rankings, Search Engine Optimization, SEO, Wpromote and others. Try to put at least 5 tags in the tag section that are found in your post if possible.

Categories

Make sure you select an appropriate category for your blog post. If you don’t have one in your category list, then simply add one that makes sense and is ‘relevant’ (That word again) to your blog post. You can select more than one category if it applies, for this post I chose, SEO, Internet News and Wpromote. I noticed that there is no ‘blogging’ category so I created one and added it to that as well.

We’re Almost Done!

At the bottom of the page below the blog content post section below the tags and categories is an area for Advanced Options.
Under ‘Excerpt’ here is where you will write the description that comes up in the Google search engines when that post comes up for a result. The average length is 160 characters. You want 2-3 sentences that describe the contents of that specific post and preferable have the main keyword phrases for that page closer to the beginning of the description.

This is VERY important, more important than the link titles (which people never seem to take the time to do, thus making it easier to outrank their sites) and is almost as important as the Title tag for the page.

-Till next time

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

On Monday, Powerset launched the beta version of their own search engine. While this is not interesting in and of itself, they have attracted a great deal of attention by using a unique algorithm to generate more relevant results. Using ‘natural language search,’ their system actively interprets the meaning of words rather than simply matching them or analyzing how frequently they are mentioned in a document. In the blogosphere world, this form of artificial intelligence has propelled them into direct competition with our favorite search engines. In addition, it has sparked rumors Microsoft may be interested in buying them out. I have to give them some credit, they were considered competition to and acquisition material for the most advanced search engines on the planet, all pre-beta release.

What makes this system so interesting is the engine’s ability to interpret the meaning of words, and actually deliver on that promise. Rather than simply indexing all the material contained in a document, the engine literally reads and assigns meaning to every single word in every single document. Talk about heavy processing capacity. By analyzing the literal meaning of a word, and then analyzing the linguistic meaning of a word and finding synonyms, the engine can find what they claim to be more relevant results than the ‘exact match’ system used on our favorite engines. I would normally smash any engine trying to compete with Google, but how can you blame anyone for trying to deliver more relevant results to the end user. The only problem with their system now is they have only indexed pages from Wikipedia and Freebase, another open database. So, as with all online content, the question becomes whether they can transform their system into a source of revenue. Given Wikipedia has failed to do this, I am curios to see what happens down the line.

And since you are all curious, click the Powerset link above and try asking the engine a question yourself. You may be surprised by the results it delivers.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

EarthLink announced today that it is “cutting the cord” or “pulling the plug” on its Wi-Fi network in Philadelphia (don’t excuse the impossible pun), once thought to be the national model for wireless Internet access.

Because of the decrease in dial-up Internet subscribers EarthLink tried to move into an untapped form of Internet delivery on a wide scale. The idea was to pepper wireless stations throughout the city that would broadcast an Internet signal. Subscribers could then connect using their user name and password, just like a wireless home network. This idea not only benefited the city, who could charge rent for allowing EarthLink to place their equipment on light posts, but also people who hated wires and EarthLink itself as an Internet provider.

EarthLink’s $17 million investment, along with its lofty promise, has turned into a failure. They projected a minimum of 100,000 users, but currently retain only 9,457 subscribers. Due to these low numbers, EarthLink stated they are losing $200,000 a month maintaining the network. Their subscribers don’t even cover half of the operating costs. In fact, EarthLink wasn’t able give away the network to nonprofits, even after offering an additional $1 million. The city has even refused to take over the network based on the sheer fact that it would cost taxpayers millions of dollars a year to maintain it.

“It’s been an unfortunate situation,” EarthLink Chief Executive Officer Rolla Huff told The Associated Press. “It was a great idea a few years ago…but it’s an idea that simply didn’t make it.”
Huff said EarthLink plans to stay focused on serving individuals using dial-up Internet service and casual Internet surfers who want an economical plan.

You would think that with all of the mobile devices that connect to Wi-Fi these days, this technology would be of tremendous value. Perhaps it still is, but the implementation was poor. It will be interesting to see if another company steps up to the challenge, or if wired will continue to rule. I suspect that it won’t, especially with the deployment of 3G in the US; but for now it seems that’s the way things will go.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

We see people all the time using tricky ways to show above legitimate websites in the search results. Google’s spam specialist, Matt Cutts, educates us on the tricks these spammers are using and how to protect ourselves against them.

Web spammers are generally trying to generate profit from free links or trying to force some sort of propaganda onto the viewer. They use tricks like filling a page with common misspellings of search terms or repetitive keywords in white text that cannot be seen without highlighting the entire page. These tricks make the spam pages seem relevant to the search term and can position them above more relevant, legitimate sites.

Google uses a technique called PageRank to prevent against this type of spam. Rather than simply viewing the content on a page and ranking based on that content, Google looks at the back links to a site and decides the importance and relevancy of the people that link to that page. This allows them to determine the individual value of the page and whether or not the site is spam.

Matt Cutts tells us one procedure to prevent against spam attacks is to incorporate information in the email forms that proves the person filling out the form is a human being. Things like asking a simple math question or requiring a valid email address. Anything that a robot cannot fill in with fake information will help you to differentiate a legitimate customer from a spammer.

Another significant idea to note is that there are illegitimate companies in existence today that claim to sell Search Engine Optimization (SEO) services when they are simply selling spam. It is important to look into the company you are using and discover in detail the strategies utilized to improve your natural rankings. Use common sense, if they doing something that seems sneaking or too good to be true, it probably is. Nobody is going to get you to number one with a click of a button. Anyone claiming to have ‘the secret’ to the search engine algorithm is likely a fake. There are in fact capable SEO firms out there and it takes months to get the results you are looking for. Google even provides a service that allows you to register your site to be reviewed and they will alert you if your website has been hacked or if there are any other problems.

To have your website reviewed visit google.com/webmasters. Please feel free to watch Matt Cutts’ presentation in its entirety as well.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

Edwin’s article about the “history of the web” really got me thinking what the web will be like years from now. The Semantic Web could possibly play a major role in the evolution of the World Wide Web. In general terms, The Semantic web is an extension of the World Wide Web where information is more standardized and better defined so that it is easier for computers to understand exactly what people are looking for on the web.

W3C director Tim Berners-Lee, a visionary behind The Semantic Web, explains more here . . . “I have a dream for the Web [in which computers] become capable of analyzing all the data on the Web – the content, links, and transactions between people and computers. A ‘Semantic Web’, which should make this possible, has yet to emerge, but when it does, the day-to-day mechanisms of trade, bureaucracy and our daily lives will be handled by machines talking to machines. The ‘intelligent agents’ people have touted for ages will finally materialize.”

So what changes need to be made to make this possible? The major requirement is a markup language more data oriented than the current convention of HTML. While HTML uses “meta tags” to provide a way for computers to categorize content on web pages, the semantic web will require documents to be published in the data specific language RDF, or Resource Description Framework. This RDF format is what will allow human perception to be understood by computers so that data is better filed and handled. While HTML describes documents and links between them, RDF describes arbitrary things such as people, meetings, or events.

While there defiantly are some clear benefits to the semantic web, there are draw backs as well. Is the idea all together unrealistic? The idea of a semantic web isn’t new. Berners-Lee’s 2001 article in Scientific American discussed the topic and we have yet to see implementation. Censorship and privacy also becomes an issue. The semantic web would make is much easier for governments to control the viewing and creation of online information. One last major concern is the amount of time it would take to publish content in this new format. Not only are we creating a document for the human reader, but an additional format for the computer. However, this problem is being addressed through the possible use of web aps creating a machine-readable format upon the publishing of data or the request of a machine for such data.

It will definitely be interesting to see what the future has to offer.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

photo credit: Andrew Baron

Chrysler recently rolled out their new car buying incentive Let’s Refuel America. The idea behind the plan is to guarantee a $2.99 price per gallon to all those who buy their vehicles. There are a few conditions that apply (such as car model, type of fuel, and annual fuel limits), but overall it seems like a plan that would turn some heads, especially in a time where the cost of oil continually hits new highs (the price is at $124 a barrel as of 5/08/08).

The Let’s Refuel America campaign is not only covered by traditional media outlets, but also generating a lot of buzz around the blogosphere and online in general.

A Google search for “lets refuel America” yields over 744,000 results and Chrysler even has a PPC campaign setup targeting specific key words.

1 Step Further With Placement Targetting

Where their PPC campaign can potentially capitalize even more is through utilizing Google’s Placement Targeting (formerly known as Site Targeting). Placement Targeting is where advertisers can select web sites on the Google Content Network where they would like to advertise on, such as GasBuddy.com and LosAngelesGasPrices.com.

With proper keyword research, placement targeting and compelling ad text, Chrysler can drive even more gas saving fanatics to their web site. While Google’s Placement Targetting is not always perfect, it’s potential should not be overlooked, especially with larger budget campaigns.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

First, I would like to state for the record that I am in love with just about anything and everything that Google does. Having said that, I do have a bone to pick with them concerning their content network.

What exactly is the content network? Google’s content network is comprised of hundreds of thousands of sites that allow Google to show targeted AdWords ads on them. This is called “AdSense” from the website publisher’s perspective. Google’s system “contextually” targets these ads by scanning each web page displaying AdSense and then displaying ads relevant to the content present on the page. So, a web page dedicated to golf might show ads relating to golf clubs, balls or vacations.

This allows advertisers to reach potential customers by advertising on websites that they visit on a regular basis, rather than simply advertising in the search results of Google.

Google’s content network is great, and can be a valuable component of a search engine marketing campaign. The problem I have is twofold:

1. The value of clicks from the content network is less than from the search network; a user on a golfing website who clicks your ad for golf clubs is less likely to purchase than a user on Google who searches for “buy golf clubs”
2. Google automatically opts advertisers into the completely “optional” content network, without any explanation of what it is, or a disclaimer about the variance in value per click.

Google’s AdWords support site states that “New keyword-targeted campaigns are automatically opted in to distribution on the Google Network, so if you want your ads to appear on search and content sites and products, then you don’t need to do a thing.”

Herein lies the problem; it is not doing me a favor to opt me automatically into the content network. In fact, there is no way to opt out of the content network while creating the campaign; even if the seemingly “optional” CPC content bid field is left blank, I am still opted in to the content network.

I can see this being a source of confusion for many AdWords users, as leaving an optional field blank typically means you are choosing not to opt in, but that is not how it is interpreted here. In order to turn off the content network, you have to go back into the campaign settings after the campaign is activated and turn it off from there.

I don’t know about you, but I think this is extremely deceptive, especially for a company whose mantra is “do no evil”. I create campaigns like it’s my job (it is!) and even I occasionally forget to go into the campaign settings immediately after to turn it off.

I cannot fathom the amount of inadvertent money spent (much of it wasted) by advertisers who have no idea that their money is being spread across the content network. If I am a new advertiser signing up to “advertise on Google”, it is a fair assumption that on Google is where my ads will appear.

Apparently, I am not alone; a few weeks ago Kabateck Brown Kellner, LLP, filed a lawsuit against Google for this very gripe. The suit was filed on behalf of David Almeida and claims that Google is deceiving AdWords users into spending money on advertising they did not explicitly request; automatically being opted in to the content network when the CPC content bid field is left blank is the basis for the suit. The lawsuit states that, “By redefining the universally understood meaning of an input form left blank, and then intentionally concealing this redefinition, Google has fraudulently taken millions of dollars from Plaintiff and the members of the class.” Kabateck has previously taken part in multi-million dollar click fraud settlements against both Google and Yahoo; maybe this is just who we need to put a stop to these deceptive tactics. In the meantime, keep an eye on those content settings!

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

Is the process by which United States administrative patent judges are appointed in this country unconstitutional? This is the question a law professor at George Washington University Law School, by the name of John Duffy, sought out to answer, after he stumbled across what appeared to be a flaw in our judicial system that dates back to 2000.

The troublesome thing is that after doing extensive research Professor Duffy found out that he was correct. He discovered a constitutional flaw in the appointment process of the judges who decide cases dealing with patent appeals and disputes, stating that the appointment process is unconstitutional. Since 2000, patent judges have been appointed by a government official who has neither the authority nor the constitutional power to appoint patent judges. The problem Professor Duffy identified at least arguably invalidates every decision the patent court has made since March 2000.

Photo credit Bhtmfan

Are you kidding me? All court cases involving patents in an 8-year span?! These findings could affect thousand of patent decisions affecting billions of dollars. Can you imagine the effect it could potentially have on our country if the Supreme Court decides that these cases should be appealed and retried? Quite honestly I can’t, but it does pose many questions. Who all will this affect? What companies? How many people’s personal lives will be turned upside down? The final ramifications could be astounding.

Cases such as the Translogic case (where $86 million is at stake) are already being taken to the Supreme Court on the basis that “an improperly constituted tribunal should not be deciding the case, so we will have to go back and have the decision made by a properly constituted panel.” Personally I can’t wait to see how this all turns out. As it stands now the justice department is not disputing Duffy’s findings and is already desperately looking for a solution. What solution will they find? I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

It was 15 years ago that the web became free thanks to the visionary leadership of computer guru and web-inventor, Sir Tim Berners-Lee.  The open-source technical documents, that he and other developers posted, liberated web tech from obscure compsci labs and released it out into the open. 8.5 Billion pages later, the World Wide Web continues to grow both in size and in its integration into our daily lives.

Interesting Web Statistics

•    Number of years each took to reach 50 million users
Radio - 38 years
TV - 13 years
Cable - 10 years
Internet - 5 years
•    The average person each month usually visits 59 domains, views 1,050 pages averaging 45 seconds for each page and spend about 25 hours a month doing this! Each surfing session lasts approximately 51 minutes
•    The estimated number of Internet users in the world for March 31, 2008 is 1,355,110,631 – 1/5 of World Population
•    Affiliate Marketing is expected to grow to over $ 230 Billion in 2008.
•    In 2007 More than 281 Exabytes of data was created, captured or replicated. (It would take more than 280 Billion iPod Shuffles to store all that data.)
•    The compound annual growth rate is expected to be almost 60 percent.

Here is what the web visionaries had to say to the bbc about the Web, and what we might expect in the next 15 years.

“The future is always in the past and for the web particularly. In a hundred years, 15 years will seem to be just the infancy of the web, when the semantic web wasn’t even completely deployed… What’s exciting is that people are building new social systems, new systems of review, new systems of governance. My hope is that those will produce… new ways of working together effectively and fairly which we can use globally to manage ourselves as a planet. “ - Sir Tim Berners-Lee

“We mustn’t forget we chose the name WWW before there was even one line of code written. We could do that because the internet as an infrastructure was already there.
Either we were going to fall on our faces or we would have something that would be truly worldwide. There was nothing in between. In much less than 15 years I think we need to figure out what the social impact is going to be of the Semantic web. I am not sure this is a good thing. I don’t know who is controlling it. And because it works by ontologies, who decides on what basis I am going to see things? “
- Robert Cailliau worked on the development of the web with Sir Tim Berners-Lee at Cern.

“What we are really building is a global brand where all the computers in the world are connected, where all the devices in the world are connected, sometimes intermittently off and on, and all the people are connected. This is going to be a very different thing. It’s ironic that back in the 70s there was all this talk about global consciousness, ‘blah blah blah’, and it really is going to happen. Except it’s going to happen mediated by computers. We are connected now to this network of devices and computers and they augment our intelligence and our ability to share, to communicate, and we as a culture are changing as a result. It’s the most profound change since the advent of literacy. And it’s bigger than the industrial revolution. We are on the front of a new renaissance; and that doesn’t mean all good things, there could be a lot of bad things there too.”
-Tim O’Reilly

“The estimate is that 80% of all content now generated on our databases in our computers is user generated and only 20% is enterprise. So how are we going to manage that tsunami, that overwhelming avalanche of information? …The future is the Semantic web, or web 3.0. Rather than at the moment what you have to do is do some smart searching, and integrate through a lot of documents that are offered up to you, Web 3.0 will be able to do a lot of that information brokering for you.”
-    Nigel Shadbolt

“But the reason it is exciting is that it makes these connections so much easier. Some of them are educational, some of them are entertainment but they are the things that make human life worth living. In 15 years the web will be everywhere; in ways we don’t know”
-    Mitchell Baker

“It’s is going to become a very refined electronic community and a set of communities that will operate at many different levels; individual interests as well as broad social efforts. You’ve seen a lot of that take place in the American elections that are gong to be taking place later this year. All the candidates have become very effective at being able to use the web as a way to both communicate and connect with their communities.”
- Mark Bernstein

“Everything is moving so fast. If you look at what I am doing with my cell phone now, transmitting live video around the world, that’s really different from just five months ago.
It’s even going on with Twitter. There is a new tweet coming into my account every 15 seconds and 15 years from now what’s that going to feel like? You are going to be able to do a lot more than 140 character messages. I will be Twittered out by then but there will be something new that comes along that will let me communicate with other people and that is what the web is all about ultimately. “
- Robert Scoble

Sounds good to me! Time to celebrate by playing Mario Kart online while I simultaneously “twitter” with my cellphone, watch The Office on my PC, and stream music on my Macbook. Whew!

Save this Post!

Hide Sites

[Ed. note: This article originally set to post on 4/28]

Google and Yahoo sitting in a tree K-I-S-S-I-N-G…well, that possibility could be a reality in the near future. Let it be known that Yahoo is currently seeking a business partnership with Google.

As of April 28, 2008, Google and Yahoo are in the middle of a two-week alpha test. This test is primarily composed of both Search Engines combining and “testing” specific search functionalities to improve Yahoo’s Online search and advertising platform. Simply put, Yahoo Is using Google’s search query and selected algorithmic components to generate and display ads to Yahoo users based upon their searches.

For those that are not familiar with Search Engine market share break down; Google controls roughly 60% of the U.S. Web search market and Yahoo owns roughly 20%. The remaining percentages are comprised of lonely MSN with about 10% market share and the remaining numbers being divided amongst smaller search engines such as Ask.com and aol.com.

The coalition of these two search engines, Google and Yahoo, could dramatically change the world of online search and advertising. In theory, this merger could eliminate all competition within this industry. Why would any business or online surfer want to use a different channel? Google and Yahoo already utilize the most advanced algorithms within the industry and retain the highest levels of user loyalty.

Due to this potential merger, the “Google/Yahoo” test is under investigation by the U.S. Justice Department and other competition regulators for possibly violating antitrust implications. Nothing of note or credible importance has yet to be quoted or released pertaining to this investigation.

I believe Yahoo is taking the right approach to test Google’s applications, strategies and brand name to improve upon their current search operations. Also, this is a slap in the face to MSN as Yahoo recently rejected their (MSN) $44 billion buy out offer. By rejecting MSN and now “working” with Google, I feel that Yahoo is moving in the right direction to improve their search functionality. If this merger happens, I believe this will be a win-win for the Google and Yahoo, but a major lose for all competing search engines.

One step at a time though, lets see what type of reports and feedback are released once the test is complete and their data is viewable. I am very interested to see what their “test” findings show and what the next steps are, if any.

Addendum:

Generally, my addenda are long and make several sub points on what I write about. However this addendum is quite the opposite. I wanted to point out that I am biased towards Google. My tone in writing this blog may not show it, but I respect Google too much and want them to succeeded and fully control this market. Google is simply a great brand with a great product, which I want to see get better. By Google helping/working with Yahoo I only see future benefits and improvement in this youthful world of Search Engine Marketing. In my eyes, I see Google as the older brother, helping his younger sibling, Yahoo.

Save this Post!